PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1497 |
Memory | 0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110609 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | May 24 '19 at 00:17 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maxtor 6L250S0 250GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE1GG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 16 8.7 6.4 6.2 MB/s
|
4.85%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Adata 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 484x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 204x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 141x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 392x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 98x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 58x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |