Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 168 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 487 48% 391 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 70.4 Reflection 73.4 Parallax 86.5 57% 76.8 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 57.7 54% 67 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 51 47 66 61 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 190 Write 139 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 59.7 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 13.2 60% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 28.9 DQ Mixed 18.7 16% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965426-402.A00LF 2x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	500x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	309x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373