Hasee CP77S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHasee CP77S  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P7xxDM(-G)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '19 at 01:47
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 708
68% 564 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 354.9
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 47.2
Parallax 49.7
46% 51 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 52.3
45% 56 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
314GB free
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 280 276 274 275 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 400
Write 400
Mixed 312
SusWrite 286
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 36.3
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 228
189% 273 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 10 17 15 31 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Read 13
Write 38.6
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 17.7
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0
15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 70%
Optical disk drive 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 419 445 453 459 459 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 34% Great: 39%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 103 108 106 111 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 108
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.7
346% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5.2
Mixed 3
4% 4.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1A1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP77S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Hasee CP77S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback