Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RF511/RF411/RF711  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF511/RF411/RF711
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 06:25
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 87.1
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 311
26% 226 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A5) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.72 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.91
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 243 238 227 228 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.9% Above average
Read 242
Write 231
Mixed 224
SusWrite 232
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 26.8
86% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 114
110% 173 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 111%
Hs-ssd-c 100 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 171 169 162 143 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 260
Write 129
Mixed 163
SusWrite 162
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 14.2
52% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 38.8
47% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-027.A01LF Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF511/RF411/RF711 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback