HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B5E
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 16:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 407
56% 413 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B5E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6890
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 7.22
6% 8.05 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 0.04
3% 4.58 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 97 80 93 78 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 500
Write 450
Mixed 435
SusWrite 134
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 1.2
112% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 20
DQ Mixed 43.3
51% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
802GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 151 154 155 156 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 128
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 155
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy) Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback