Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M3300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire M3300
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3300  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '16 at 20:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 89.8
47% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 192
22% 173 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus EAH4870 series
Asus(1043 0278) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.782.0.0
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 9.88
13% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.81
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 16.7
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 57.6
Mixed 23.7
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.28
88% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34%
Great: 44%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
199GB free
Firmware: GM2OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 83.3
Write 78.7
Mixed 22.8
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.35
92% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung Nanya Nanya 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3300 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Acer Aspire M3300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback