Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS/BR  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 05:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 201
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 346
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 68.9
58% 70.3 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 68.8
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 84 101 107 91 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 143
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 98.4
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
116GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 84 86 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 84.6
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mushkin 99[2/7/4]199[F/T] 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback