Asus N56JN

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus N56JN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N56JN
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 03:43
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	87%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 17.2 2-Core 46.7 35% 47.2 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 178 18% 146 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 14AD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.59 2% 3.08 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 400 399 396 379 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 407 Write 374 Mixed 319 SusWrite 383 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 17.1 61% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 199 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 117%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25 4,291 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 60GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 24 24 26 24 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 197 Write 33.7 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 25.2 86% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 6.3 582% 7.9 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 9.8 887% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB 456 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.7 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.8 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N56JN Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N56JN

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	110x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	105x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	18x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	159x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	74x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	50x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	46x
ASU16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 553 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16