Samsung

M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB

M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
BENCHMARKS (11,835)
MKT (0.1%)
BUILDS
(0)

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≤ Q4 2015.

Effective Speed -73%Effective Speed -73%Average User Bench -82%MC Read -82%, MC Write -76%, MC Mixed -89%Peak Lab Bench -123%MC Read -120%, MC Write -114%, MC Mixed -134%Value & Sentiment -354%User Rating -36%, Market Share -672%Nice To Haves -42%SC Read -38%, SC Write -76%, SC Mixed -44%, SC Read -49%, SC Write -89%, SC Mixed -56%, Latency -16%, Latency -23%, Age 16%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB

Average Bench: 53.1% (85^th of 108)

Based on 11,835 user benchmarks. Model: Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB

Poor: 41%Average: 53.1% Great: 58%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB averaged 46.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 19.8GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 19.5GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB is just 17.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.3GB/s

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 15.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 11,835 samples)

Rank 8553.1%

Min	Avg	Max
14.4	MC Read 19.5	21.8
14.7	MC Write 19.8	22
13.7	MC Mixed 16.5	18.1
53.2% 18.6 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
6.28	SC Read 13.3	16.3
5.88	SC Write 15.9	20.9
7.76	SC Mixed 16.9	20.3
43.9% 15.4 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
66	Latency 81.7	114
49% 81.7 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

TUR-User, 13 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

58.1% Above average

MC Read 21.8

MC Write 21.5

MC Mixed 17.2

58% 20.2 GB/s

SC Read 15.5

SC Write 17.7

SC Mixed 20.3

51% 17.8 GB/s

Latency 71.5

56% 71.5 ns

TUR-User, 11 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

57.2% Above average

MC Read 21.5

MC Write 21

MC Mixed 16.5

56% 19.7 GB/s

SC Read 16.6

SC Write 18.8

SC Mixed 19.9

53% 18.4 GB/s

Latency 73.1

55% 73.1 ns

MYS-User, 13 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

56.7% Above average

MC Read 21.9

MC Write 20.3

MC Mixed 16.8

56% 19.7 GB/s

SC Read 15.5

SC Write 18.7

SC Mixed 20.3

52% 18.2 GB/s

Latency 79.4

50% 79.4 ns

TUR-User, 9 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

56.3% Above average

MC Read 20.2

MC Write 21.6

MC Mixed 17.4

56% 19.7 GB/s

SC Read 13.8

SC Write 15.1

SC Mixed 19.8

46% 16.2 GB/s

Latency 72.3

55% 72.3 ns

SWE-User, 13 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

56% Above average

MC Read 21.2

MC Write 20.6

MC Mixed 16.8

56% 19.5 GB/s

SC Read 13.9

SC Write 18.1

SC Mixed 17.6

47% 16.5 GB/s

Latency 72.1

56% 72.1 ns

ESP-User, 13 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

55.6% Above average

MC Read 19.9

MC Write 21

MC Mixed 16.9

55% 19.3 GB/s

SC Read 16

SC Write 17.1

SC Mixed 17.7

48% 16.9 GB/s

Latency 73.3

55% 73.3 ns

ITA-User, 1 hr ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

54.7% Above average

MC Read 21.6

MC Write 19.3

MC Mixed 16.7

55% 19.2 GB/s

SC Read 13.8

SC Write 17.6

SC Mixed 16.9

46% 16.1 GB/s

Latency 79.9

50% 79.9 ns

CAN-User, 13 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

47.3% Average

MC Read 19.2

MC Write 14.1

MC Mixed 14.8

46% 16 GB/s

SC Read 13.6

SC Write 15

SC Mixed 17.5

44% 15.4 GB/s

Latency 78.5

51% 78.5 ns

BHR-User, 12 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz

46.9% Average

MC Read 15.1

MC Write 20

MC Mixed 16.6

49% 17.2 GB/s

SC Read 11.5

SC Write 13.8

SC Mixed 13.8

37% 13 GB/s

Latency 157

26% 157 ns

11,835 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 20,386,766 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB Builds (Compare 2,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Asus N550JK

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 51%, 26,704 samples	1,316x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 51%, 46,592 samples	730x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 36%, 6,605 samples	73x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 184,005 samples	1,382x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 6,909 samples	745x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $230Bench 56%, 658,138 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $57Bench 106%, 497,964 samples	106x
X110 256GBSanDisk $100Bench 79%, 2,616 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $107Bench 113%, 417,557 samples	92x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 11,835 samples	505x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $427

Popular M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

Workstation

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchMark.
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- See speed test results from other users.
- Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- Share your opinion by voting.

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

108 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145	Nvidia GTX 1660 $210	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240	Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185	Nvidia RTX 2060 $349	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14

Samsung

M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB

Average Bench: 53.1% (85^th of 108)

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

Strengths

Very good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Asus N550JK

Popular M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Samsung

M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB

Average Bench: 53.1% (85th of 108)

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

Strengths

Very good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Asus N550JK

Popular M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 53.1% (85^th of 108)