Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 23:16
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 259
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 1001
89% 751 Pts
64-Core 2,545
158% 2,545 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.5% Very good
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 108
Parallax 92.5
79% 99.2 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 92.6
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$176
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0221B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1463 1725 1757 1870 1768 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 1,845
Mixed 123
SusWrite 1,698
343% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.3
244% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 643
DQ Mixed 583
490% 718 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 315%
Great: 379%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 123GB
112GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 6.1 9.6 8.6 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 9.7
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 8.5
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.8
207% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Wireless Stick 128GB
119GB free, PID 55a9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 13 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 11.6
17% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.6
173% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 65.2
MC Write 64.2
MC Mixed 62.6
183% 64 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 26.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 160%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback