Asrock Z97 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140916
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 243
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 667
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 282B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 39
28% 34.3 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34.1
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Diss 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 79 85 88 90 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (87th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.7% Good
Read 258
Write 124
Mixed 181
SusWrite 86
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 36.6
158% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 47.8
62% 112 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
99GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 105 105 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 110
Write 50
Mixed 70
SusWrite 102
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1.5TB
577GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 29.2
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 49%
G-DRIVE USB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 8034
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 29
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 29.1
41% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 23.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Killer Builds (Compare 1,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback