C&T PC300 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemC&T PC300 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardC&T PC300 Series
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '16 at 16:54
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5010U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 104
52% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 149
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 6.28
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.13
4% 5.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innodisk Corp. - mSATA 3ME2 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M15101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
Read 451
Write 78
Mixed 126
47% 218 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 1.88
44% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 63.4
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 11.9
21% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 52%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 112
Write 17.6
Mixed 58.5
65% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown i-DIMM 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback