Lenovo 10131

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10131  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140618
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 22:56
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 596
60% 489 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
MSI(1462 2928) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.44
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 8.25
6% 7.54 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 7.73
Splatting 8.09
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 90 85 87 86 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 476
Mixed 386
SusWrite 126
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 57
192% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 64GB
52GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 265 265 266 266 266 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 328
Write 265
Mixed 244
SusWrite 264
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 26.5
88% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 121
87% 112 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
274GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 141 141 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 121
Write 102
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 140
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75%
Great: 109%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
2GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 8.3 8.5 9.2 9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 11.3
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 10.3
17% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
82% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
0GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.5
Write 20
Mixed 23.8
30% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.4
225% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10131 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback