Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 14:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 169
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 580
53% 446 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1399 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 43.4
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 35.8
29% 34.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 109 79 27 0.6 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 31.5
Write 465
Mixed 356
SusWrite 93.4
55% 236 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 35.4
62% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 189
187% 297 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 93%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$59
81GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 70 70 68 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 54
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 70.3
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 2400 C16 Series 2666 C16 Series 8GB
2800, 2800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 31.4
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 28.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback