Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 136
60% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 398
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
PowerColor(148C 2336) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 50.9
32% 41.8 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 34
Splatting 41
30% 35.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teaml5li te3D1T 1TB
467GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 382 381 397 393 390 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 439
Mixed 397
SusWrite 383
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 45.7
150% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 124
128% 209 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Adata Adata 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback