Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 184 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 514 50% 413 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 570 2,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% Asus(1043 04C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.5% Above average	Lighting 65.2 Reflection 66 Parallax 84.9 53% 72 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 59.5 Splatting 53.7 48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 63 47 9.1 58 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 80.7 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 53 49% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A16 CMZ16GX3M2A16 Kingston 99U5471-032.A Kingston 9905471-006.A 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 23.9 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $72Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x

RAM
4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 1,028 samples	23x
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 60%, 1,250 samples	7x
F3 DDR3 2400 C11 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 99%, 23 samples	7x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $715