Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 12:07
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 422
56% 422 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 68
Parallax 86.9
57% 74.9 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 56.7
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 55 14 54 53 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68% Good
Read 510
Write 380
Mixed 341
SusWrite 56.4
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 25.1
119% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 34.9
74% 141 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68%
Great: 101%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
8GB free, PID cb10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.4 6.6 6.6 6.6 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Read 9
Write 2.8
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6
8% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 36.8
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback