HP 550-267nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-267nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 18:44
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 188
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 619
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 85.4
82% 92.5 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 85
Splatting 76.7
70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 110 106 97 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 406
Write 121
Mixed 106
SusWrite 109
40% 186 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 29.5
118% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 164
140% 213 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 87%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 1TB
182GB free
Firmware: A800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 131 138 144 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 140
Write 140
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 140
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1C1600C9 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-267nz Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: HP 550-267nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $565
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback