Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 13:13
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 109
54% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 300
33% 262 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1442 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 54.8
46% 56.9 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 49.4
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 30 27 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 249
Write 51.3
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 28.4
21% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 10.1
36% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 38.7
68% 142 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
55GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 270 301 312 307 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 251
Write 284
Mixed 211
SusWrite 294
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 15.1
47% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 226
193% 282 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
102GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 82 114 111 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 131
Write 141
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 106
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 114%
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58
516GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 82
Write 58.6
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 87.5
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
396GB free
Firmware: SM12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 97 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50% Above average
Read 77.7
Write 97.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 96.6
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
75GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 102
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CM3X4GB2133C11Y4 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback