Sintrones AMB-5200G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSintrones AMB-5200G  (all builds)
MotherboardSINTRONES AMB-5200G
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 20:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 153
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 519
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 8.66
6% 9.35 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 17
10% 11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innodisk Corp. - mSATA 3MG2-P 124GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M161225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 177 178 177 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
Read 395
Write 178
Mixed 218
SusWrite 177
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 25.1
116% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 172
142% 207 MB/s
2.5" SATA SSD 3TG6-P 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: A18925
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 309 378 405 330 289 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.4% Good
Read 314
Write 366
Mixed 166
SusWrite 332
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 25.5
108% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 39
44% 72 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-AGS1OCRG 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMB-5200G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Sintrones AMB-5200G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback