Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 103
50% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 102
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 95.7
6% 95.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.94
2% 1.36 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M3 320GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 41 46 49 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 42.4
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 49%
WD Elements SE 25FF 2TB
125GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 26 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 22.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 24.9
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback