Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 23 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 71.7 1-Core 17.9 2-Core 34.3 32% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 33.5 8-Core 32.3 4% 32.9 Pts	64-Core 30.2 2% 30.2 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
16gb SATA Flash Drive 16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: SFDDA01A SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7 7.6 8 9.9 13 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 55.2 Write 2.8 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 9.3 15% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 379% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 27%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 7GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 8.3 8 8.2 10 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 91.6 Write 2.3 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 8.3 29% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.9 184% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4238334331 1x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $25Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25