HP 24-b212na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 24-b212na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B8
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 18:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9730P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 40.1
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 55.3
25% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 86.1
8-Core 114
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 81B8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 10.1
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 5
4% 5.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 158 236 251 367 339 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 127
Write 151
Mixed 123
SusWrite 249
37% 162 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 10.3
34% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 182
136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 111%
Jmicron Generic 2TB
924GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 58 79 75 76 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 26
Write 57
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 65.8
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 1.9
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24-b212na Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 24-b212na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback