Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '16 at 02:37
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 157
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 420
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 35.2
22% 29.4 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 31
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512G PCIe 500GB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,350
Write 951
Mixed 1,047
248% 1,116 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 14.6
68% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 85.1
88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 140%
Great: 223%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2TB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 38.4
Mixed 37.1
49% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 0.3
107% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
1TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 38
Mixed 37.2
49% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.29
104% 1.27 MB/s
WDC WD30 EURS-63R8UY0 3TB
445GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
212GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 37.8
Write 39.4
Mixed 38.6
50% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 9.62
1,015% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 10.4
1,124% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 75%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393936353531362D3138392E413030472020 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback