Asrock Z77 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 354
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3609) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 44.2
27% 36.3 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 35
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 316 309 312 308 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 459
Mixed 398
SusWrite 294
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 42.1
140% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 367
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97%
Great: 124%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$88
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 149 150 150 147 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 150
Write 141
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 143
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84%
Great: 85%
LGE USB Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID 70d6
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9 9 9 8.8 8.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 9.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8.7
14% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4 Builds (Compare 764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4 - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback