Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-PS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-PS  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 09 '19 at 01:28
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$142
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 146
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 257
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.56
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 2.96
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 99 119 96 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 112
Write 126
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 79.7
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.4
120% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905471-084.A00LF 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-PS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-PS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback