HP 870-224

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP 870-224 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161219
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '19 at 03:42
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$87 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 192 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 403 54% 406 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 57.8 54% 63.1 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 65 54% 65.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,217 Write 54.3 Mixed 109 235% 1,127 MB/s	4K Read 542 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 7.6 833% 184 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 129%
WD My Passport Essential 640GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 31GB free, PID 070a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 36 32 31 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 25.7 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 32.1 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.2 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 11.9 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-224 Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: HP 870-224

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $87Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	598x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	32x
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	467x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	17x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	22x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	140x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $282

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16