HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2280
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 138
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 193
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2280) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 4.97
2% 5.82 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM8110F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 171 171 171 172 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 88%
Smart SZ9MSE mSATA 256GB
382GB free
Firmware: EXT48D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 171 171 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 447
Write 259
Mixed 196
SusWrite 171
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 25
102% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 81.1
116% 218 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback