Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 01:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 189
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 282
35% 268 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 64.6
55% 66.4 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 67.6
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 318
Write 251
Mixed 233
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 25.3
125% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 103
74% 100 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
157GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 66
SusWrite 87
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 24.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback