Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory47.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 10:44
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 764
69% 580 Pts
64-Core 1,964
122% 1,964 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2773) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 54.9
34% 45.3 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 36
37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMC SMC2108 511GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 219 195 135 86 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SMC SMC2108 478GB
408GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 521 475 477 547 552 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SMC SMC2108 958GB
233GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 817 886 883 849 778 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SMC SMC2108 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1414 1419 1412 1419 1414 1410 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 32.5
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.6
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback