Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 53.6 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 46.2 30% 43.9 Pts	4-Core 72.9 8-Core 91.8 11% 82.4 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1742) 1GB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.53 2% 1.84 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 2.39 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 97 76 106 104 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 420 Write 403 Mixed 338 SusWrite 133 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 31.5 103% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 270 210% 288 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 93GB free Firmware: JE3OA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 34 27 43 42 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 8.8 Write 44.5 Mixed 11 SusWrite 39.3 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F1333 878A 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.9% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 5.2 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	155x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	3x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,529 samples	3x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $202