Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory5.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 23:32
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$54
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 73.6
44% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 82.6
10% 79.1 Pts
64-Core 80.6
5% 80.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 SE
XFX(1682 227E) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS72105 500GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 25 27 67 75 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 37
Write 49.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 54.9
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
65GB free
Firmware: H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 57 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 29.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 55.8
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 40%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
65GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 76 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 75
Write 72.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 71.2
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MK4058GS 400GB
115GB free
Firmware: 1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 52 50 49 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 55.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 50.7
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
PNY U3 1TB
67GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 25
34% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback