HP h9-1120t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h9-1120t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '16 at 01:27
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 512
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 545
MSI(1462 2315) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7306
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 5.22
6% 6.81 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 7.03
Splatting 10
7% 8.66 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 531
Write 506
Mixed 519
116% 519 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 43.6
178% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 164
178% 299 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1120t Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

System: HP h9-1120t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback