Today's hottest deals

Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 17:43
Run Duration471 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 117
52% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 295
30% 245 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 109
Parallax 180
68% 124 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 170
Splatting 121
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 263 140 180 82 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64% Good
Read 411
Write 330
Mixed 318
SusWrite 161
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 172
133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
284GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 216 118 206 157 277 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66% Good
Read 428
Write 321
Mixed 348
SusWrite 189
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 29.7
97% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 179
127% 165 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 66%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
210GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 110 68 110 60 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 84
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 88.3
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 113%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$139
436GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 82 51 85 45 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 66.6
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$139
565GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 81 50 82 44 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 83
Write 78.5
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 64.7
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 99%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$139
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 130 79 130 71 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 162
Write 67.8
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 103
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76%
Great: 99%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
298GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 115 64 112 59 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 170
Write 168
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 89.2
162% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 98%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
190GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 82 46 83 44 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 90
Write 86.7
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 64.3
101% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 60%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
39GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 15 23 12 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 97.3
Write 105
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 18.8
99% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.6
148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 85%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 25 41 23 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 33.5
104% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 48%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB
538GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 9.5 16 8.8 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 23.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 12.7
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 98%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
162GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 15 23 12 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 180
Write 174
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 18.9
147% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
134% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 82%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
465GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 25 41 23 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 85.8
Write 101
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 33.8
91% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 48%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 10
Mixed 4
SusWrite 1.1
7% 5.08 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 1170 3TB
306GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 9.3 16 8.8 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 12.6
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 58%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
323GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 14 23 12 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 154
Write 148
Mixed 104
SusWrite 19.9
135% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.5
145% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 85%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
432GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 40 25 41 23 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 156
Write 152
Mixed 101
SusWrite 34.4
142% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 83%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
549GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 40 25 41 23 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 85
SusWrite 33.9
112% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.1
246% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 17
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback