PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
Memory | 20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150323 |
Uptime | 12.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '19 at 17:43 |
Run Duration | 471 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
82.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 263 140 180 82 153 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
284GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 216 118 206 157 277 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
210GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 110 68 110 60 113 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$139
436GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 82 51 85 45 84 MB/s
|
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$139
565GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 81 50 82 44 82 MB/s
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$139
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 130 79 130 71 129 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
298GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 115 64 112 59 114 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
190GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 82 46 83 44 83 MB/s
|
32.8%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
39GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 15 23 12 25 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 25 41 23 42 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB
538GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 9.5 16 8.8 16 MB/s
|
8.38%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
162GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 15 23 12 23 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
465GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 25 41 23 40 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 4.8 MB/s
|
1.3%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Book 1170 3TB
306GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 9.3 16 8.8 16 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
323GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 24 14 23 12 32 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
432GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 40 25 41 23 50 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB
549GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 40 25 41 23 47 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 448x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 217x |
FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 68x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $585 |