HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '19 at 08:55
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 392
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-PRO
Sapphire(174B E410) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4
Parallax 0.97
2% 2.32 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 32 16 19 15 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 44.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 18.8
28% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 44%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 160GB-$34
36GB free
Firmware: GMBOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 40 32 22 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 14
Write 26.3
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 40.9
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
54% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 9905471-021.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback