Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '19 at 23:49
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 178 76% 127 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 298 41% 302 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 3.84 3% 4.28 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 3.33 Splatting 9.74 5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 3 17 23 70 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 367 Write 290 Mixed 214 SusWrite 33.2 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 14.4 49% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 12.3 29% 61 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 865GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 185 182 183 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 160 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 183 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.3 7.9 7.4 7.9 7.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 18.9 Write 7 Mixed 9.1 SusWrite 7.6 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.9 192% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB 5,412 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 11.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	720x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	479x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	305x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	392x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	128x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16