Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 22:54
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 222
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 702
67% 554 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2766) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 36.4
26% 32.1 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 32.3
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 378 388 378 378 378 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 894
Mixed 729
SusWrite 383
173% 774 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 50.3
164% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 457
345% 460 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 139%
Great: 487%
Marvell Raid VD 0 2TB
874GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 121 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 339
Write 166
Mixed 181
SusWrite 121
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 28.1
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 131
99% 132 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 109%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
865GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 138 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 89.3
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 143
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 173 176 178 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 106
Write 87
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 174
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
465GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 128 129 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 132
Write 98.8
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 131
143% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53%
Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
484GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 124 123 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 141
Write 95.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 118
123% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 35.8
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback