Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150113
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateJul 28 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 181
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 447
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 10.9
8% 9.68 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 274 145 146 144 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 428
Write 348
Mixed 320
SusWrite 188
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 28.3
90% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 303
215% 271 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback