Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory90GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 90GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory85.6 GB free of 90 GB
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 02:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 171
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 663
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 137GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 90GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 10240 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 44.9
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback