PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Samsung RC410/RC510/RC710 (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG RC410/RC510/RC710 |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110119 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '19 at 19:32 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
39.9%
Below average
|
44% 70 Pts
|
15% 113 Pts
|
7% 118 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A2) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
|
0.86%
Terrible
|
1% 1.01 fps
|
1% 1.19 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 142 75 64 58 45 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
32% 142 MB/s
|
20% 6.53 MB/s
|
136% 181 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown M471B5273CH0-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1066, 1334 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.3%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
32% 124 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 23x |
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 14x |
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 1x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 32x |
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |