Today's hottest deals

Biostar TH55XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TH55XE  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 23:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 K 875-$174
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 166
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 402
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
MSI(1462 3050) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 40.5
27% 34.7 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 35.4
26% 30.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 150 70 74 77 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 204
Write 198
Mixed 174
SusWrite 110
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 25.9
92% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 33.1
31% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
126GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.8% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 21.8
Mixed 21
SusWrite 14.8
27% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 32%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 640GB
6GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.83% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 10
Mixed 15
SusWrite 14.5
20% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TH55XE Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TH55XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback