Today's hottest deals

Notebook W54_55SU1,SUW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemNotebook W54_55SU1,SUW  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W54_55SU1,SUW
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 13:20
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4100M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 62.7
40% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 98.6
11% 88.6 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5455) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 2.19
1% 1.94 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 297 309 307 310 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 371
Write 394
Mixed 352
SusWrite 310
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 29.9
99% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 231
175% 235 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.9
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W54_55SU1,SUW Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W54_55SU1,SUW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback