HP s5-1440kr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP s5-1440kr  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G870-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 91.4
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 72.6
48% 68 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 138
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2ADA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: LSF042C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 244
Write 231
Mixed 211
SusWrite 72.1
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 27.9
89% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 158
124% 170 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 103 92 114 114 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 117
Write 111
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 104
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 21 21 24 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 91.4
Write 7.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 23
30% 32 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
102% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 7.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback