Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 16:58
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 115
54% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 204
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.3% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 78.8
48% 67.5 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 54
46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 195 199 189 205 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 334
Write 201
Mixed 208
SusWrite 205
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 177
150% 218 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 142 144 142 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 93.3
Write 96.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 143
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
2TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 132 124 123 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 129
156% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
106% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1333M/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback