Biostar H61MGC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MGC  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 89.2
46% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 99.1
8-Core 103
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2565GSXN 250GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 55 53 57 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 43.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 53.8
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MGC Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MGC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback