Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150414
Uptime	14.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '16 at 21:00
Run Duration	84 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 198 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 570 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 26.2 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 33.7 21% 29.1 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 25.9 Splatting 27 24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 M.2 512GB PCIe AHCI 41 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 272GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW25D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 40 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 27 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1642 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7732728850 (F2) Unknown 99 99 7896395589	151% Outstanding	Read 1,334 Write 1,021 Mixed 1,259 268% 1,205 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 21.9 106% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 35.1 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 21.8 34% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 151% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB 963 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 42.8 MC Mixed 35.9 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 21.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,243x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	958x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	412x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	417x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	209x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16