Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI GENE  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '19 at 17:20
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4771-$115
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 566
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.2% Good
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 99.4
Parallax 75.7
64% 84.5 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 76.9
Splatting 92.3
71% 85.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 40 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 84%
Palit UVSE 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 227 83 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 312
Write 264
Mixed 254
SusWrite 120
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 30.2
130% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 166
141% 204 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
41GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 57 53 55 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 130
Write 143
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 55.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
62GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 140 141 145 122 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 83
SusWrite 133
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 109%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 110
Write 22.3
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 22
41% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.4
81% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 24GB
1600, 1400, 1600, 1400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 22
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback