Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte G31M-ES2L
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G31M-S2L  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '19 at 20:27
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$50
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 67.5
39% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 66.6
8-Core 61.7
9% 64.2 Pts
64-Core 63.6
4% 63.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.33
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 9
6% 8.41 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 7.91
6% 7.21 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 199
Write 212
Mixed 176
SusWrite 54
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 28.3
86% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 87.6
DQ Mixed 43.3
38% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 124%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
126GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 50.4
Write 47.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 54.7
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
262GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 77 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 69.1
Write 72.4
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 79.3
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 68%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7.6 6.6 7.2 6.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7
10% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 7%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 14.8
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 74%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
2TB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 31
Write 22.2
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 14.8
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 3.8
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G31M-S2L Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback