HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2271
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 05:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y71
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 46.5
36% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 84
8-Core 87.7
11% 85.8 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
HP(103C 2271) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 2.41
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300s SATA M.2 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 375
Write 25.5
Mixed 209
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 19.9
65% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 110
89% 125 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 746448-181 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback