Today's hottest deals

HP 500-377nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 500-377nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '19 at 07:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 105
56% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 286
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 73 143 133 96 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 112
Write 137
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 106
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 112%
USB DISK 30X 1GB
1GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.02% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.6
8% 6.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G Adata AM2L16BC4R1-B0ES 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-377nf Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-377nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback